Open and forecast funding opportunities
Pulled from grants.gov on October 29, 2026: 173 open or forecast opportunities from the funders we follow, soonest deadline first. Each card links to the official record, which is the only reliable source. Forecasts have no announcement yet, and dates can change.
See one you are applying for? We are a mixed-methods evaluation practice, and we will write the evaluation plan and logic model with you at no charge.
Not every opportunity requires an evaluation. Where one is not required, a sound evaluation plan can still strengthen an application, because it shows reviewers how you will know the work succeeded. Evaluation notes are our short summary of the announcement or of the funder’s recent announcements; always check the official text.
SAMHSA (8)
Evaluation: SAMHSA's FY2026 announcements scored data collection and performance measurement at 15 to 20 of 100 points and required a named evaluator on the project team. Expect the same when these forecasts post. What this funder asks of evaluators, and where we fit.
Residential Treatment for Pregnant and Postpartum Women
Evaluation: Expect a scored data and performance section (15 to 20 of 100 points) and a named evaluator.
Providers Clinical Support System – Universities
Evaluation: Expect a scored data and performance section (15 to 20 of 100 points) and a named evaluator.
GLS Campus Suicide Prevention
Evaluation: Expect a scored data and performance section (15 to 20 of 100 points) and a named evaluator.
Assisted Outpatient Treatment
Evaluation: Expect a scored data and performance section (15 to 20 of 100 points) and a named evaluator.
State Pilot Program for Treatment for Pregnant and Postpartum Women
Evaluation: Expect a scored data and performance section (15 to 20 of 100 points) and a named evaluator.
Children's Mental Health Initiative
Evaluation: Expect a scored data and performance section (15 to 20 of 100 points) and a named evaluator.
Show all 8
Emergency Department Alternatives to Opioids Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored data and performance section (15 to 20 of 100 points) and a named evaluator.
Building Communities of Recovery
Evaluation: Expect a scored data and performance section (15 to 20 of 100 points) and a named evaluator.
HRSA (48)
Evaluation: HRSA scores evaluation or performance reporting in each announcement, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points, and funded projects report HRSA performance measures. Confirm in each announcement when it posts. What this funder asks of evaluators, and where we fit.
Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education (THCGME) Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education (THCGME) Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 State and Regional Primary Care Association (PCA) Cooperative Agreements
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Rural Residency Planning and Development Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Rural Health Value Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Infant-Toddler Court Program–National Resource Center
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Show all 48
The Home Visiting Research, Improvement, Sustainability and Evaluation Center (HV-RISE)
Evaluation: A national center that helps home visiting programs use research, test improvements and expand what works.
Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM) Technical Assistance Center
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Infant-Toddler Court Program–State Awards
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Women's Initiative for Screening and Health (WISH)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Rural Health Network Development Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Rural Health Network Development Planning Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Rural Maternity and Obstetrics Management Strategies Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Health Workforce Research Center (HWRC)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Children’s Hospitals Graduate Medical Education (CHGME) Payment Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
HIV Care Grant Program – Part B States/Territories Formula and AIDS Drug Assistance Program Formula and AIDS Drug Assistance Program Supplemental Awards
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
HIV Care Grant Program – Part B States/Territories Formula and AIDS Drug Assistance Program Formula and AIDS Drug Assistance Program Supplemental Awards: Pacific Islands Jurisdictions
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Service Area Competition (SAC)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Service Area Competition (SAC)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Fiscal Year (FY) Service Area Competition (SAC)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Service Area Competition (SAC)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part C Capacity Development Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Telehealth Nutrition Services Network Grant Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Chronic Care Telehealth Centers of Excellence Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Centers of Excellence (COE)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Maternal and Child Health Encounters Networks (MCHEK)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Family-to-Family Health Information Centers (F2F HIC)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Leadership Education in Adolescent Health (LEAH)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Nutrition Training Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part D – Women, Infants, Children and Youth Grant Supplemental Funding
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part B AIDS Drug Assistance Program Training and Technical Assistance
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) Integrated HIV/AIDS Planning Resource Allocation Cooperative Agreement
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part B States/Territories Supplemental Grant Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Emergency Relief Funds (ERF)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Rural Communities Opioid Response Program – Evaluation
Evaluation: This award pays for an evaluation: of rural behavioral health strategies under RCORP, with evaluation tools for rural communities.
Rural Communities Opioid Response Program – Community Systems Development
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Rural Communities Opioid Response Program – Overdose Response
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Rural Communities Opioid Response Program – Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Regional Excellence for Access to Comprehensive Care for Hemophilia Networks (REACH Networks)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs Research Network
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM) Capacity Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Fetal, Infant, and Child Death Review Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Appalachian Region Healthcare Support Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Native Hawaiian Health Care Improvement Act Program
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Fiscal Year 2027 Regional Nutrition Hubs
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
Healthy Tomorrows Partnership for Children Program (HTPCP)
Evaluation: Expect a scored evaluation or performance reporting criterion, usually 10 to 20 of 100 points.
CDC injury and overdose prevention, including Drug-Free Communities (7)
Evaluation: CDC injury center announcements require an evaluation and performance measurement plan (for example, CDC-RFA-CE-26-0061). Expect the same when these forecasts post. What this funder asks of evaluators, and where we fit.
Preventing Violence Affecting Young Lives (PREVAYL 2.0)
Evaluation: Funds health departments to implement and evaluate violence prevention strategies for adolescents and young adults.
Core State Injury Prevention Program (Core SIPP)
Evaluation: Expect a required evaluation and performance measurement plan.
Drug-Free Communities (DFC) Support Program – NEW (Year 1)
Evaluation: Last cycle the evaluation and performance measurement plan was worth 25 of 100 points, and coalitions join the national cross-site evaluation.
Comprehensive Suicide Prevention Program for States
Evaluation: Recipients evaluate their own approach, with a focus on continuous quality improvement and measurable outcomes.
Modernizing Violent Death and Suicide Surveillance Using the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS)
Evaluation: Expect a required evaluation and performance measurement plan.
Drug-Free Communities (DFC) Support Program – Competing Continuation (Year 6)
Evaluation: Last cycle the evaluation and performance measurement plan was worth 25 of 100 points, and coalitions join the national cross-site evaluation.
Show all 7
Supporting Community Application of Life-Saving Evidence to Prevent Injury and Violence (SCALE)
Evaluation: Expect a required evaluation and performance measurement plan.
Administration for Children and Families (4)
Evaluation: Evaluation rules vary by ACF program, from a scored performance evaluation plan to a required independent evaluator. See each card. What this funder asks of evaluators, and where we fit.
Preschool Development Grant Birth Through Five (PDG B-5) SMART Grant
Evaluation: A scored project performance evaluation plan, worth 15 of 130 points. No outside evaluator is required.
Tribal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program: Development and Implementation Grants
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Head Start/Early Head Grants in Multiple States
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Early Head Start Expansion and Early Head Start – Child Care Partnership Grants in Multiple States
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Justice Department: Bureau of Justice Assistance (23)
Evaluation: BJA does not require an outside evaluator. Some programs give priority to applicants who commit to a research partner, and applicants who evaluate their own work add a statement on evaluation independence. What this funder asks of evaluators, and where we fit.
BJA FY 2026 Veterans Treatment Court Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Prosecuting Cold Cases Using DNA
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement- Competitive Grants Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Capital Case Litigation Initiative: Improving the Quality of Legal Representation in State Capital Cases
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 DNA Capacity Enhancement for Backlog Reduction (CEBR)—Formula Grants Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Rural Violent Crime Reduction Initiative
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
Show all 23
BJA FY 2026 National Center for Veterans Justice
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Adult Treatment Court Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Students, Teachers, and Officers Preventing (STOP) School Violence Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Second Chance Act Community-based Reentry Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY26 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement – Formula Grants Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Upholding the Rule of Law and Preventing Wrongful Convictions Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Comprehensive Opioid, Stimulant, and Substance Use Program (COSSUP) Training and Technical Assistance (TTA)
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY26 DNA Capacity Enhancement for Backlog Reduction (CEBR)—Competitive Grants Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 John R. Justice (JRJ) Formula Grant Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program—Local Formula
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Tribal Civil and Criminal Legal Assistance
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crimes Act Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Justice Reinvestment Initiative: Strengthening State and Local Operations to Reduce Crime and Recidivism
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Residential Substance Abuse Treatment for State Prisoners – Formula Grants Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
OJP FY 2026 Integrity in American Elections Grant Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Missing and Unidentified Human Remains (MUHR) Program
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
BJA FY 2026 Postconviction Testing of DNA Evidence
Evaluation: No outside evaluator required; a research partner can earn priority in some programs.
Justice Department: Office for Victims of Crime (2)
Evaluation: Evaluation rules vary by program. Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OVC and OVW FY 2026 Victim Services for Angel Families Program – Invited Notice of Funding Opportunity
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OVC FY 2026 Specialized Human Trafficking Assistance: Task Forces and Legal Services
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Justice Department: juvenile justice and violence against women (16)
Evaluation: Research is outside the scope of most Office on Violence Against Women programs, except its Research and Evaluation Initiative; assessments for quality improvement are allowed. For juvenile justice programs, check each announcement.
OJJDP FY 2026 Victims of Child Abuse Act Training and Technical Assistance for Child Abuse Professionals
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Missing and Exploited Children Training and Technical Assistance
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Juvenile Drug Treatment Court Program
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Strengthening Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Technological Investigative Capacity
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Multistate Mentoring Programs
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Community and Schools Youth Drug Prevention Program
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Show all 16
OJJDP FY 2026 Second Chance Act Youth Reentry Program
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force Program Support
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Emergency Planning for Juvenile Justice Residential Facilities
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Strategies to Support Children Exposed to Violence
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Mentoring for Youth Impacted by Opioids and Other Substance Use
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Opioid Affected Youth Initiative
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Internet Crimes Against Children On-Line Child Protection System (ICACCOPS)
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Expanding Youth Access to Community-Based Treatment
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Family Treatment Court Program
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
OJJDP FY 2026 Juvenile Justice System Enhancements
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
National Science Foundation education programs (19)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for a project evaluation plan, and some require an external evaluator. Advanced Technological Education proposals must budget for an independent evaluator. Check each solicitation. What this funder asks of evaluators, and where we fit.
Centers of Research Excellence in Science and Technology (CREST)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
IUSE: Innovation in Two-Year College STEM Education (ITYC)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Arctic Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants (Arctic DDRIG) Arctic Social Sciences, Arctic System Sciences, and Arctic Observing Network (DDRIG)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Tribal Colleges and Universities Program (TCUP)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Improving Undergraduate STEM Education: Directorate for STEM Education (IUSE: EDU)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Training-based Workforce Development for Advanced Cyberinfrastructure
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Show all 19
NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM)
Evaluation: Asks for an external evaluation plan.
Pathways to Enable Secure Open-Source Ecosystems (PESOSE)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE) Program
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity Education Innovation and Scholarship for Service (CyberAI SFS)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
IUSE / Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
EPSCoR Research Infrastructure Improvement Program: EPSCoR Collaborations for Optimizing Research Ecosystems (E-CORE)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Integrated Data Systems & Services (IDSS)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
EPSCoR Research Infrastructure Improvement Program: EPSCoR Research Incubators for STEM Excellence (E-RISE)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Advanced Technological Education (ATE)
Evaluation: Proposals must budget for an independent evaluator.
Collaboratory to Advance Mathematics Education and Learning (CAMEL) for K-12
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Professional Formation of Engineers (PFE)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
NSF STEM K-12 (STEM K-12)
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Research in the Formation of Engineers
Evaluation: Many NSF education programs ask for an evaluation plan; some require an external evaluator.
Department of Education (2)
Evaluation: The current listings are education research grants from the Institute of Education Sciences, not program evaluations.
Institute of Education Sciences (IES): National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER): Transformative Research in Special Education, Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 84.324T
Evaluation: An education research grant, not a program evaluation.
Institute of Education Sciences (IES): National Center on Education Research (NCER): From Seedlings to Scale, Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 84.305J
Evaluation: An education research grant, not a program evaluation.
Department of Labor, Employment and Training (4)
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Fiscal Year 2027 State Workforce Agency Unemployment Insurance Resource Planning Targets and Guidelines
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Training and Employment Guidance Letter (02-26) for FY 2026 Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Updated National Dislocated Worker Grant Program Guidance and Application Information
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
Unemployment Insurance Integrity Center of Excellence Operations
Evaluation: Check the announcement's evaluation and performance measurement section.
AmeriCorps (1)
Evaluation: AmeriCorps State and National grantees averaging $500,000 or more a year must arrange an independent evaluation; smaller grantees evaluate internally (45 CFR 2522.710). Other AmeriCorps programs set their own rules. What this funder asks of evaluators, and where we fit.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 AmeriCorps State and National Competitive Grants
Evaluation: Grants averaging $500,000 or more a year need an independent evaluation; smaller grantees evaluate internally (45 CFR 2522.710).
Other NSF research programs (39)
Evaluation: These are NSF research programs, reviewed on intellectual merit and broader impacts. Check each solicitation for any evaluation plan it asks for.
NSF Small Business Innovation Research / Small Business Technology Transfer Phase I, Phase II, Fast-Track Programs: A Pilot Emphasis on Scientific Instrumentation
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Unlocking Dataset Value for AI-Enabled Scientific Discovery (AI Datasets)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
U.S. National Science Foundation State and Regional Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Hubs:
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
PFE: Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (PFE: RIEF)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Plasma Physics
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
National Science Foundation Translation to Practice (NSF TTP)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Show all 39
National Science Foundation Fostering Interdisciplinary Networks to Develop Emergent and Responsive Solutions Foundry (NSF FINDERS FOUNDRY)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Oceanographic Facilities and Equipment Support
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Social Psychology
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Research on the Science and Technology Enterprise: Indicators, Statistics, and Methods (NCSES S&T)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Security, Privacy, and Trust in Cyberspace (NSF SaTC)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
EPSCoR Research Infrastructure Improvement Program: Focused EPSCoR Collaborations (FEC)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Cognitive Neuroscience (CogNeuro)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Developmental Sciences (DS)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Biological Anthropology Program Senior Research Awards (BA-SR)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Science and Technology Studies (STS)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE): Future Computing Research (Future CoRe)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Mid-scale Research Infrastructure-1
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
A Science of Science Approach to Analyzing and Innovating the Biomedical Research Enterprise (SoS:BIO)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Mid-Career Advancement (MCA)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Expeditions in Computing
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
NSF National Quantum Virtual Laboratory (NQVL)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
EPSCoR Research Infrastructure Improvement (RII): EPSCoR Research Fellows
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Findable Accessible Interoperable Reusable Open Science (FAIROS)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program (EGFP)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Community Infrastructure for Research in Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CIRC)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowships (AAPF)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
The Research on Research Security Program (RoRS)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Growing Research Access for Nationally Transformative Economic Development (GRANTED)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
National Science Foundation National Innovation Corps Teams (NSF National I-CorpsTM Teams) Program
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Facilitating Research at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions: (RUI and ROA-PUI)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Law & Science (LS)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Sociology
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Infrastructure Capacity for Biological Research (Capacity)
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Crosscutting Activities in Materials Research
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
National Facilities
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Cyberinfrastructure for Public Access and Open Science
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Ocean Drilling Program
Evaluation: Check the solicitation for any evaluation plan.
Applying for one of these?
Send us the opportunity number and your deadline. You will hear back within one business day.
Every inquiry is confidential. We never sell or share your information. Privacy policy.